Seminars in Perinatology
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 105-120, April 2010

Newborn Screening System Performance Evaluation Assessment Scheme (PEAS)

  • Bradford L. Therrell Jr, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • National Newborn Screening and Genetics Center, Austin, TX
    • University of Texas Health Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Bradford L. Therrell Jr, MS, PhD, National newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center, 1912 W. Anderson Lane, Austin, TX 78759
  • ,
  • Marion Schwartz, MSN, RN

      Affiliations

    • National Newborn Screening and Genetics Center, Austin, TX
    • University of Texas Health Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
  • ,
  • Carol Southard, BS

      Affiliations

    • National Newborn Screening and Genetics Center, Austin, TX
    • University of Texas Health Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
  • ,
  • Donna Williams, BS

      Affiliations

    • National Newborn Screening and Genetics Center, Austin, TX
    • University of Texas Health Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
  • ,
  • W. Harry Hannon, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Newborn Screening Branch, Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Marie Y. Mann, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, MD
  • ,
  • PEAS Organizing and Working Groups

Newborn screening (NBS) reaches approximately all of the 4 million newborns in the United States each year and has been effective in significantly reducing the morbidity and mortality that results from certain congenital conditions. The comprehensive NBS system can be divided into preanalytic (education and screening), analytic (laboratory testing), and postanalytic (reporting, short-term follow-up/tracking, diagnosis, treatment/management, ancillary services, and outcome evaluation) activities. To monitor and improve the screening system, there has been increasing emphasis on evaluation models. Federal sponsorship of a model performance evaluation and assessment scheme (PEAS) has resulted in a comprehensive listing of quality indicators for system self-assessment. We review the PEAS evolution process in an effort to illustrate the necessary infrastructure considerations in a well-functioning NBS system. Readers are encouraged to identify their role in the system and to interact appropriately at the local level. The comprehensive PEAS indicator list is provided as an Appendix.

Keywords: newborn screening, quality assurance, system, performance, indicators

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by HRSA grants U32MC00148 and U36MC02604.

PII: S0146-0005(09)00107-4

doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2009.12.002

Seminars in Perinatology
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 105-120, April 2010