Seminars in Perinatology
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 61-73 , April 2007

Dilemmas Initiating Enteral Feedings in High Risk Infants: How Can They Be Resolved?

  • Jon E. Tyson, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Jon E. Tyson, MD, MPH, Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 2.106, Houston, TX 77030.
  • ,
  • Kathleen A. Kennedy, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • Joseph F. Lucke, PhD

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • Claudia Pedroza, PhD

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Houston, TX.

References 

  1. Ehrenkranz RA, Dusick AM, Vohr BR, et al. Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1253–1261
  2. Ehrenkranz RA, Younes N, Lemons JA, et al. Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 1999;104:280–289
  3. Kennedy KA, Tyson JE. Early versus delayed initiation of progressive enteral feedings for parenterally fed low birth weight or preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(Issue 1):(Updated Issue 1, 2005; no new trials identified)
  4. Lucas A, Bloom SR, Aynsley-Green A. Gut hormones and ‘minimal enteral feeding’. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1986;75:719–723
  5. Berseth CL. Neonatal small intestinal motility: motor responses to feeding in term and preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1990;117:777–782
  6. Davey AM, Wagner CL, Cox C, et al. Feeding premature infants while low umbilical artery catheters are in place: a prospective, randomized trial. J Pediatr. 1994;124:795–799
  7. Khayata S, Gutcher G, Bamberger J, et al. Early versus late feeding of low birth weight (LBW) infants: effect on growth and hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Res. 1987;21:431A
  8. Mileur LM, Meyer JA, Chan GM. Effect of early, low volume enteral feedings on very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. Pediatr Res. 1993;33:307A
  9. Tyson JE, Kennedy KA. Trophic feedings for parenterally fed infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(Issue 3):
  10. Johnson CR. The trophic action of gastrointestinal hormones. Gastroenterology. 1976;70:277–278
  11. Aynsley-Green A. Hormones and postnatal adaptation to enteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1983;2:418–427
  12. Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C, et al. Feeding strategies for premature infants: randomized trial of gastrointestinal priming and tube-feeding method. Pediatrics. 1999;103:434–439
  13. Saenz de Pipaon M, VanBeek RH, Quero J, et al. Effect of minimal enteral feeding on splanchnic uptake of leucine in the postabsorptive state in preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2003;53:281–287
  14. Berseth CL, Bisquera JA, Paje VU. Prolonging small feeding volumes early in life decreases the incidence of NEC in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003;111:529–534
  15. Becerra M, Ambiado S, Kuntsman G, et al. Feeding VLBW infants; Effect of early enteral stimulation (EES). Pediatr Res. 1996;39:304A
  16. Berseth CL. Effect of early feeding on maturation of the preterm infant’s small intestine. J Pediatr. 1992;120:947–953
  17. Berseth CL, Nordyke C. Enteral nutrients promote postnatal maturation of intestinal motor activity in preterm infants. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:G1046–G1051
  18. Dunn L, Hulman S, Weiner J, et al. Beneficial effects of early hypocaloric enteral feeding on neonatal gastrointestinal function: preliminary report of a randomized trial. J Pediatr. 1988;112:622–629
  19. McClure RJ, Newell SJ. Randomised controlled trial of clinical outcome following trophic feeding. Arch Dis Child. 2000;82:F29–F33
  20. Meetze WH, Valentine C, McGuigan JE, et al. Gastrointestinal priming prior to full enteral nutrition in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1992;15:163–170
  21. Ostertag SG, LaGamma EF, Reisen CE, et al. Early enteral feeding does not affect the incidence of NEC. Pediatrics. 1986;77:275–280
  22. Slagle TA, Gross SJ. Effect of early low-volume enteral substrate on subsequent feeding tolerance in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1988;113:526–531
  23. Troche B, Harvey-Wilkes K, Engle WD, et al. Early minimal feedings promote growth in critically ill premature infants. Biol Neonate. 1995;67:172–181
  24. Kennedy KA, Tyson JE. Rapid versus slow rate of advancement of feedings for promoting growth and preventing NEC in parenterally fed low-birth-weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1998;(Issue 4):(Updated Issue 2, 2005; no new trials identified)
  25. Uauy RD, Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, et al. NEC in very low birth weight infants: biodemographic and clinical correlates. J Pediatr. 1991;119:630–638
  26. Brown EG, Sweet AY. Preventing NEC in neonates. JAMA. 1978;240:2452–2454
  27. Book LS, Herbst JJ, Jung AL. Comparison of fast- and slow-feeding rate schedules to the development of NEC. J Pediatr. 1976;89:463–466
  28. Caple J, Armentrout D, Huseby V, et al. Randomized controlled trial of slow versus rapid feeding volume advancement in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1597–1600
  29. Rayyis SF, Ambalavanan N, Wright L, et al. Randomized trial of “slow” versus “fast” feed advancements on the incidence of NEC in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1999;134:293–297
  30. Scott DT, Bauer CR, Kramer HC, et al. The neonatal health index. In:  Gross RT,  Spiker D,  Haynes CW editor. Helping Low Birth Weight, Premature Babies (The Infant Health and Development). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1997;p. 341–357
  31. Guyatt G, Rennie D. Users’ Guide to the Medical Literature (A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice). In: Chicago, IL: AMA Press; 2002;p. 385–392
  32. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. In: Clinical Epidemiology, The Essentials. (ed 4). New York, NY: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins; 2005;
  33. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, et al. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials (An extension of the CONSORT statement). JAMA. 2006;295:1152–1160
  34. Chalmers I, Sinclair JD. Promoting perinatal health: is it time for a change of emphasis in research?. Early Human Dev. 1985;10:171–191
  35. Rothman KJ. A show of confidence. N Engl J Med. 1978;14:1362–1363
  36. Berry DA. Bayesian clinical trials. Nature reviews. 2006;5:27–36
  37. Kuehn BM. Industry, FDA warms to “adaptive” trials. JAMA. 2006;296:1955–1957
  38. Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, et al. Methods in health services research (An introduction to Bayesian methods in health technology assessment). BMJ. 1999;319:508–512
  39. Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics.1. The P value fallacy. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:995–1004
  40. Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2. The Bayes factor. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:1005–1013
  41. Louis TA. Introduction to Bayesian methods. II. fundamental concepts. Clin Trials. 2005;2:291–294
  42. Lilford RJ, Thornton JG, Braunholtz D. Clinical trials and rare diseases: a way out of a conundrum. 1995;311:1621–1625
  43. Berry DA. Statistics (A Bayesian Perspective). Belmont, CA: Duxberry Press; 1996;
  44. Spiegelhlater DJ, Abrams KR, Myles JP. Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health Care Evaluation. Chicester: Wiley; 2004;
  45. Premji S, Chessell L. Continuous nasogastric milk feeding versus intermittent bolus milk feeding for premature infants less than 1500 grams (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Library. 2001;(Issue 3):Oxford: Update Software
  46. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration: International conference on harmonization: guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials; availability. Fed Reg. 1998;63:49590–49591
  47. Wiens BL. Choosing an equivalence limit for noninferiority or equivalence studies. Control Clin Trials. 2002;23:2–24
  48. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, et al. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials (An extension of the CONSORT statement). JAMA. 2006;295:1152–1160
  49. Diamond GA. Bayesian approaches to the analysis and interpretation of clinical megatrials. J Am College Cardiol. 2004;43:1929–1939

PII: S0146-0005(07)00030-4

doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.02.008

Seminars in Perinatology
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 61-73 , April 2007